![]() ![]()
The M1 ultra scores about 12,000 on CB while a stock AMD 3990x is banging out 82,000. ![]() M1 max does not show up until the 37 position and even with estimated 2x performance of the M1 Ultra the results are still not in the top ten. #Benchmarks deleted from geekbench allegations PcHeck even this MDN article says the performance is “jaw dropping” but in reality its jaw dropping for 2017 or jaw dropping for a mobile chip but against the fastest PC CPUs its just far below average. In a sense, Apple is forcing a mobile design into a workstation category and using a lot of marketing smoke n mirrors with vauge benchmark charts to make claims that mislead the target audience Most everyone choosing a Workstation would prioritized speed over power draw. I agree that the M1 ultra is a great design when you consider speed per power usage but when power usage isn’t as important of an issue like in a desktop workstation then the M1 Max and Ultra are kinda of slow compared to the top end AMD processors.Ĭheck out the bench marks below, when you compare the M1 Max to the AMD 3990, the M1’s get smoked by a long shot by a 2 year old processor. #Benchmarks deleted from geekbench allegations macThank you!Īpple M1 Ultra chip is fast for a Mac processor/gpu but in terms of raw performance the M1 design with limited cores is years behind AMD in terms of processing power and render speed. Click or tap here to support our independent tech blog. This is why we refer to non-Apple Silicon Macs as “Intel-handicapped.” #Benchmarks deleted from geekbench allegations proMacDailyNews Take: The Geekbench 5 results for the Mac Studio (Mac13,2) housing an Apple M1 Ultra show a 1,793 Single-Core Score and a 24,055 Multi-Core Score.Ī Mac Pro with a 28-core Intel Xeon W-3275M 2.5 GHz scored 1,152 in Single-Core and 19,951 in Multi-Core.Ī 16-inch MacBook Pro with an Intel Core i9-9980HK 2.4 GHz (8 cores) scored 1,085 in Single-Core and 6818 in Multi-Core.įor further reference, 16-inch MacBook Pro with an Apple M1 Max scored 1,747 in Single-Core and 12,233 in Multi-Core. This makes sense-the M1 Ultra bumps the core count way up, but the cores are still the same. Single-core performance isn’t much different than it is for devices powered by the standard M1, like the Mac mini. A Mac Pro with that processor costs an eye-watering $13,000, compared to $4,000 for the M1 Ultra Studio model. Both its single and multi-core performance scores far exceed those of the 2019 Mac Pro’s fastest 28-core Xeon W-3275M processor. If the page is real, it helps to back up Apple’s performance claims. Predictably, a genuine-looking results page for the Mac Studio and M1 Ultra appeared in the Geekbench online results database shortly after Apple’s event ended. ComputerWorld describes it as one large “840mm squared die.” The M1 Ultra will look like one big piece of silicon, just as it appears in Apple’s render shots, two M1 Max chips packaged together with a silicon interposer between the two. Each chip in the M1 family - M1, M1 Pro, M1 Max, and now M1 Ultra - unleashes amazing capabilities for the Mac. The first benchmarks to hit Geekbench Browser for Apple’s M1 Ultra have appeared and they are jaw-dropping. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |